Warning: minimal rant ahead…
WHY do some weblogs not put the full article in their RSS feed. I can understand for some large sites that they want the reader on their own site because of (sigh) ads placed on-site, but certainly for some (semi-)personal weblogs, this really doesn’t make any sense. Perhaps some people don’t know they’re doing it (I don’t have my own RSS feed in my reader..) but I’m usually not very inclined to click on the actual link in my rss reader (btw, tiny tiny rss rocks). Some of the sites doing this: standaard.be, explosm.net, geenstijl.nl, engrishfunny.com … meh.
Incoming Links (via Technorati):
- Apple TV Now Shows your Genius Recommendations
Apple TV now has Genius recommendations for your TV and movies. - Genetically Modified Food and Politics: It’s All in Oath of Office
A shocking new novel at the crossroads of politics and medicine. - The Independent Spirt Awards - Who needs an Oscar?
The rise of independent films and their impact on the Oscars. - Best SuperBowl Commercials of All Time
The SuperBowl is known for the commercials, here's a list of the best SuperBowl commercials of all time. - Would You Sacrifice Your Child For the Love of God?
“Men never commit evil so fully and joyfully as when they do it for religious convictions” - Blaise Pascal
January 19th, 2009 at 13:10
Have to agree on both things:
* WHY do some weblogs not put the full article in their RSS feed. !!
)
* tiny tiny rss rocks !! (Used google reader before, but changed to TTRSS, it is fricking cool